The Democratic Party: Depressingly Ineffective.™
The Democratic Party: We Won’t Put Up Much Of A Fight.™
The Democratic Party: Wait, We Won?™
The Democratic Party: We’ll Forgive Our Opponents Repeatedly So You Don’t Have To.™
The Democratic Party: Defeat You Can Believe In.™
The Democratic Party: How Much More Of A Majority And Public Support Do We Need To Get Anything Done?™
Category: Uncategorized
All About the Benefits
TNR reports on the firing of Hyatt’s Boston-area housekeepers, noting:
The housekeepers, some of whom had worked for Hyatt for over twenty years, were making between $14 and $16 an hour plus health, dental, and 401(k) benefits. Their replacements were to make $8 an hour with no health benefits.
It’s unclear to me why, within the context of the current debate about healthcare, the benefits angle to this story has received zero attention. Instead, everyone rushes to the $16/hr to $8/hr change in gross-pay. Sure, Hyatt is now paying half as much and these replacements are, apparently, pretty much all there on guest-worker visas (and so are, by definition, short-term, damned near cash basis day workers).
The key fact, though, is all that stuff that comes after the mention of base pay. These folks that have been fired were getting health, dental, and 401k benefits. That’s a vaguely astounding contract they had; seemingly unprecedented, actually. I’d wager Hyatt cut their expenses on employing these workers by four to five fold just by dropping benefits. Tacking on the pay cut was just gravy; something they did because they could. Based on some back-of-envelope calculations using these figures to get ballpark estimates for provisioning the insurance coverage, to provide the health benefits (forgetting dental and 401k for now) Hyatt was paying these workers the equivalent of $23/hr. Add in the rest and you’re up to $30/hr easily. Probably well beyond it.
So, we have workers’ jobs cut specifically to save on the (presumably) outrageous expense of providing them with healthcare; these firings have subsequently gone national for a variety of completely unrelated reasons. During the biggest healthcare debate of my lifetime. What does the media focus on with absolute uniformity? An $8/hr pay differential. As if nothing else is going on here. Do we mention that these uninsured guest workers still create a cost on healthcare in this country? Do we mention that Hyatt has effectively shifted some of its healthcare expenses from Hyatt to you, the US Taxpayer? Do we mention that this is yet another clear-cut case of spiraling health coverage costs measurably and indisputably claiming jobs, all the while adding to the rolls of the unemployed (and uncovered) in this country? Of course not. Keep walking. That sort of thing just isn’t said.
Healthcare reform is wrong for the country unless it gets ‘somewhere between 75 and 80 votes.’
Shake It Up
Hate to break it to these guys: shaking a developing Polaroid is just like tapping the unopened top on a can of something carbonated. It’s just something to do while you wait around for equilibrium (can) or chemical reactions (Polaroid) to occur; these user-actions aren’t actually doing anything.
But, even if we accept the (wrong) notion that shaking a Polaroid picture does something: Why in the name of Christ would one want to implement said delay in the “development” of a photo on an iPhone? It’s beyond reason. It’s like paying to have the iPod app “warm up” for a few minutes when you launch it, complete with some simulated tubes glowing more and more brightly on the screen. Or making the YouTube app disappear slowly into a central dot when you close it and periodically lose vertical hold while you engage in spectation unless you beat the side of the phone a time or two (this app would also need a distant voice screaming not to hit the TV, you’ll break it! after each required series of phone-taps).
Other than that: great product, boys. Positively bully!

When will he learn?
Reconcile This
Ezra Klein muses on reconciliation:
“…a reconciliation bill should not look like the current health-care reform bill. It should be an expansion of public programs: Bring Medicaid up to 150 or 200 percent of the poverty line and allow people from 45 to 65 to buy into Medicare and give some of them tax credits to do so. I don’t know if there are votes for that strategy. But it wouldn’t run afoul of the Senate parliamentarian.”
Absolutely. Sounds good to me. And I think the surest way to bring your more recalcitrant conservative Democrats aboard (and maybe even a Republican or two) is to offer these as your legislative choices on the (much harder to deal with) Senate side:
1) Some modified Baucus bill type package with a Rockefeller-style robust public option (or per-state’s option to activate said plans) that goes through “normal” channels, gets 60 votes for cloture, and then 51 for final passage. Goes to Conference to line it up with the House’s existing version.
-or-
2) We put it through reconciliation as Medicare for all. You want to buy in, buy in. You can’t afford it, we’ll subsidize you. You like your current plan: keep it. 51 votes to pass, House has to pass something new to match.
I think there’d be a waiting line on option (1) about 45 seconds after the wheels were set in motion. And reconciling a Medicare-for-all with the House? I don’t see that as a big problem; they’d have something passed about 45 minutes later…after all, it’s essentially what a number of them tried to push through on the first go-round anyway. It’s my understanding that they failed because of a (perceived) lack of support for such a move on the Senate side (e.g. such a move would be DOA; better to pass something akin to what the Senate might be moving to pass).

“A lot of people didn’t like it,” Gambell said. “A lot of people found it kind of asymmetrical and untraditional and kind of a little bit hard to decode.”
A lot of people are fucking idiots too. But, by all means, kowtow to them.
Where BJ Comes Down
So far as I’m concerned, the healthcare debate is over. BJ Hunnicutt has come out for single payer. The rest is just trivial details, my friends.
Worth noting: he’s also for single-payer with regards to gutter cleaning.
Health care reform is wrong for the country unless it gets ‘at least 70 votes’
–Orrin Hatch, ® Fucktardia.
Who will be the first to propose the magical 100 vote margin?
Four Rejected Palin Book Titles
First: 87 Ways to Satisfy Sarkozy in the Sack (and Keep Him Begging for More).
Second: Palin’s Digest: Recent Publications Summarized in 400 pages. (Yes, All of Them.)
Third: Annular Bragg Resonators: Beyond the Limits of Total Internal Reflection
Fourth: Bridge to Somewhere: 14 Fabulous Days with the McCain Campaign