Tag: FISA

The Impossible Has Happened

No one could have expected:

Despite pledges by President George W. Bush and American intelligence officials to the contrary, hundreds of US citizens overseas have been eavesdropped on as they called friends and family back home, according to two former military intercept operators who worked at the giant National Security Agency (NSA) center in Fort Gordon, Georgia.

“These were just really everyday, average, ordinary Americans who happened to be in the Middle East, in our area of intercept and happened to be making these phone calls on satellite phones,” said Adrienne Kinne, a 31-year old US Army Reserves Arab linguist assigned to a special military program at the NSA’s Back Hall at Fort Gordon from November 2001 to 2003.

Kinne described the contents of the calls as “personal, private things with Americans who are not in any way, shape or form associated with anything to do with terrorism.”

She said US military officers, American journalists and American aid workers were routinely intercepted and “collected on” as they called their offices or homes in the United States.

This is only the marginally above board part of this particular iceberg. Guaranteed, absolutely, 100% take-it-to-the-bank: they were using this stuff for purely political ratfucking style oppo research and general mayhem. No doubt whatsoever. Whether or not we’ll ever get to that information is doubtful, but it’s there somewhere. Start with the attorney firing and work backwards.

Clarity

Let’s just make clear that I agree with the point of this paragraph in its entirety:

As for FISA, while in principle I think legally restricting government spying is a good thing, in practice I’m skeptical it makes much difference. As someone who has had a foot in the harder “left”, the one that gets spied on, the old FISA rules didn’t stop government infiltrators or all sorts of violations of privacy. […] I see FISA as a nice issue to huff and puff about, but it’s a pretty minor issue compared to just ending the war [and] shutting down torture…

It’s not about “making a difference” in a strict “the government shall never spy on its citizens without due process” sense. It’s about making a stand. It’s about the political optics of the vote. It’s about letting your opponent flail about with a bunch of vague claims as opposed to clear, quantifiable, and antithetical viewpoints from you and your campaign over the course of a very few months.
Is this so hard to understand? Is there no Democratic policy adviser that can understand these simple facts? You are the Change Candidate and you choose to side with the least popular President in history? To hand the GOP a bill that they couldn’t pass when they held control of both houses of Congress? This is Change we can Belive In?

Let the illegal, warrantless wiretaps expire in August. Tell America why you did so. We still would have the secret FISA court, and plenty of low-barrier, almost-never-denied secret warrants out there avialable for when bin Laden makes that so-frequently-heralded call to somebody in this country. We already know these things were approved on the least scrap of probable cause. That bit of non-action accomplished, you set about prosecuting anyone and everyone who took part in these illegal wiretaps.

But don’t take my word for it. Check out this quote:

“This Administration has put forward a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we demand. When I am president, there will be no more illegal wire-tapping of American citizens; no more national security letters to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime; no more tracking citizens who do nothing more than protest a misguided war. Our Constitution works, and so does the FISA court.”

That would be Obama, back in 2007. I guess he thinks it’s better to wait until he’s President to live up to those words rather than to do so yesterday when it really mattered.

9/11 didn’t happen because law enforcement couldn’t tap a phone. Broadly speaking, it happened because when presented with a memo titled “bin Laden determined to strike in US” Bush said “All right. You’ve covered your ass, now” Period.

Fucktards

NYT reports:

Supporters of the plan, which revised the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, said that the final vote reflected both political reality and legal practicality. Wiretapping orders approved by a secret court under the previous version of the surveillance law were set to begin expiring in August unless Congress acted, and many Democrats were wary of going into their political convention in Denver next month with the issue hanging over them—handing the Republicans a potent political weapon.

So the crack group of thinkers running the Democrat Party responded by…handing the Republicans a potent political weapon. Here, Luthor, have some kryptonite. I know there’s nothing you can do with this. Ha, see how I’ve outmaneuvered you by giving you the thing with which to kill me.

Naturally, the Democrat had a cunning plan:

Democrats pointed to some concessions they had won from the White House in the lengthy negotiations. The final bill includes a reaffirmation that the surveillance law is the “exclusive” means of conducting intelligence wiretaps — a provision that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats insisted would prevent Mr. Bush or any future president from evading court scrutiny in the way that the N.S.A. program did.

Ho ho ho, they sure showed the GOP. First, let me legalize everything illegal you’ve been doing for years. Then, I’ll also let you and your enablers off the hook without EVER checking into what, exactly, it was you were even doing. Then, I’ll reaffirm, in a very strongly worded letter, that the law is the law! Amazing, really. Such strict terms.

Worth noting that a GOP Congress couldn’t get this piece of shit passed; for that, we needed the Democrats in charge. Brilliant. Thank God Dear Leader is reportedly happy and expected to sign the bill into law quickly. Wouldn’t want to inconvenience or annoy the least popular President in the history of polling. Why, that might make the Democrat appear weak and feckless.